Space assemblers| Let's Connect

Awards & Nominations

Space assemblers has received the following awards and nominations. Way to go!

Global Nominee

Let's Connect

For bigger spacecraft capable of executing bigger missions, some of the assembly may be done in space. Your challenge is to design a simple approach that enables components to be assembled in space.

T.O.A.S2.T. (Tinned Origami Architecture for Space Smart Tending)

Summary

The proposed conceptual solution is a flat sandwich-like deployable infrastructure capable to assembly and verify from small to large space-devoted items. It introduces an innovative coupling procedure based on the use of space-grade adhesive joints, performed by multiaxial robots placed on top. The adhesives permit to streamlines the schedule and the design/verification process, typically followed on-ground, reducing the associated costs. An “industrial” logistic, powered by an origami solar panels cluster, is adopted for a planned sequential procedure permitting to connect single parts in a whole structure. Additionally, a service-inflatable module is attached for astronauts and EVA.

How We Addressed This Challenge

(The full project with pictures is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C6C5ds-iacaaRa0cLAPL-m38w__rIebx/view?usp=sharing )

What did you develop? 

The T.O.A.S2.T. (Tinned Origami Architecture for Space Smart Tending) project is an in-space dockyard capable to build up small, medium and large space-devoted frames. It is integrated into a launch (from Earth) – docking – assembly – verification – delivery full process, thanks to which the single components are turned into a whole structure. Such architecture implements an innovative assembly paradigm based on the use of space-grade adhesive joints, reducing the mechanical connection complexity among integrated modules and sub-systems. It makes use of an “industrial” logistic, in order to achieve in-space assembly and test of custom or series production components. It takes place on a flat origami-based and sandwich-like deployable platform unfolded by a foam inflatable balloon.


The full procedure is electrically powered by a NASA® Starshade-like (https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/resources/1015/flower-power-nasa-reveals-spring-starshade-animation/ ) solar panels cluster. It starts with the docking phase between the full-of-components tanks. These latter come from Earth and are grabbed by dedicated telescopic arms, which store them into deployable-truss bays. 

Each bay is planned as “hot-spot” where specialized multiaxial robots automatically actuate the assembly/verification procedure(e.g. from https://www.universal-robots.com/). Such robots are mounted on a conveyor belt, that allows the base translation, and host a variety of different end-effectors (e.g. gripper, dispensers, calipers, gauges, sensors) useful for the building procedure. Moreover, they are controlled by a pre-programmed sequential code, customized for the specific purpose, developed and transferred by the space agency, contractors or sub-contractors. A dedicated region is also provided for the additive manufacturing of customized metallic parts (https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Advanced_Manufacturing, https://cdn2.b2match.io/event/3084/assets/8475250769-d3b6fe41d5.pdf, https://artes.esa.int/news/additive-manufacturing-%E2%80%93-making-impossible-possible-3d-printing ) if nedeed.

An inflatable and habitable service module (Nasa® LISA-like https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180007255 or Nasa® Bigelow-like https://www.space.com/bigelow-aerospace-space-habitat-nasa-test.html ) is also included into the architectural concept for manned operations (e.g. E.V.A for maintenance interventions) as well as a transit station for future space life. 




Why is it important? 

A huge and significant step forward into the exploration and colonization of the fourth ambient (near and outer space) will be accessible from the in-orbit manufacturing and the assembly of space components into entire, complex and multi-purpose structures (e.g. habitable modules). This spirit is also shared from the Italian Centre for Near Space (CNS) involved into different project as Orbitecture (https://www.instituteforthefuture.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/CNS-Vision.pdf ), a space dome for the cis-lunar conquest.

The proposed space platform (the dockyard) fits into the mentioned framework and introduces multiple and important innovation sources. First of all, the use of effective and reliable space-grade adhesive joints, rather than classical mechanical fasteners, permits to shift most of the assembly-verification procedure from Earth to a space orbit, being the influence of the launch environment on the separated items less severe. This is particularly relevant for the launch vehicle requirements (e.g. frequency requirement). Starting from this consideration, multiple launches can be planned, reducing the time and cost associated to the verification and test of the structural part. This idea is supported by the by-now developed technology of reusable rockets, avoiding the launcher wastefulness and relative costs too. Additionally, the use of reliable space-grade adhesive joints is a promising technology also in case of disassembly needs. In fact, by means of mechanical cutter, attached on the multiaxial robots, they can be easily removed.

Subsequently, the proposed architecture implements a new deployment concept based on the coupling of a foam inflatable balloon with an origami unfoldable structure, preventing complex and actuated systems and permitting to save mass and volume at the launch phase.

In addition, the developed source of innovation is represented by the launch (from Earth) – docking – assembly – verification – delivery full process which is accessible with the nowadays technological capabilities in the framework of an in-space industry. All space agencies or independent entrepreneurs will benefit from this infrastructure, even only for in-space substitution of a single broken component, without threaten the success of the whole mission.




What does it do?

The primary task that the platform has to fulfil is the assembly-verification procedure. Being the docking phase a well-established procedure, currently adopted from now-a-days space platform, the fundamental duty consists on the capability of the entire build-up sequence. It has to make available a consistent spacecraft as the outcome of entire cycle, storing in proper bays the components. More specifically, the multiaxial robots have to pick up the right components, satisfying the mechanical positioning requirements, and join them together with the mentioned space-grade adhesive joints avoiding the use of classical mechanical fasteners that could be difficult to manage in gravity absence. The proposed architecture has also to be capable to provide and operate verification procedure during the assembly and in a dedicated bay. The additional service inflatable module has to be capable to host astronauts for EVA operations, proving the environmental conditions for life in space.




How does it work?

Different steps are required to permit the practical use of this conceptual study: 0. A preliminary phase requires to put into orbit the T.O.A.S2.T. infrastructure. A first launch will be necessary to put into orbit the sandwich-like structure which is in a folded configuration, stowed into the launcher. Once in orbit, the balloon is inflated and the origami is deployed. Ulterior launches will be required to the assembly of the bays, the inflatable service module and the multiaxial robots. This step, here not investigated in details, is mandatory for the fulfilment of the entire technological process; 1. Small and compact modules, the full-of-components cargo, are send into space. Once approached to the space architecture (rendezvous), telescopic arms capture them, performing a selective docking based on the contained components or sub-system (e.g. thermal, electrical, structural…); 2. Automatic robots download the content of a cargo into the bay for storage and assembly purposes; 3. Once empty, the modules are detached from the bays, performing the undocking procedure. They are ready to re-enter into the Earth atmosphere; 4. The assembly process can start. From the first to the last bay, dedicated multiaxial robots perform the assembly of the whole structure adopting space-grade adhesive bonding; 5. The verification process (e.g. optics alignment, mechanical tolerances) takes place during the assembly procedure for dedicated equipment and into a dedicated bay for the whole space structure; 6. Once the process is terminated, the structure is located on a near waiting region to start its mission;

An additional step can be taken into account if needed, i.e. the astronaut maintenance operations in case of issues.

The assembly architecture can also work as a disassembly platform using dedicated mechanical cutters to remove the adhesive layers and separate each sub-system putting them into the cargo modules. The electrical supplying is made available from a NASA® Starshade-like origami structure. It is a cluster of solar panels embedded on a flower-based deployable structure which occupy low volumes when stowed and high irradiated surface when deployed.




What do you hope to achieve?

Through the proposed compact infrastructure, which occupy low volume at launch, we intend to achieve an innovative and feasible space platform thanks to which: the production will be accessible shifting it from Earth to a space orbit and the costs related to the verification and design process on the ground will be reduced.

How We Developed This Project

(The full project with pictures is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C6C5ds-iacaaRa0cLAPL-m38w__rIebx/view?usp=sharing )


The T.O.A.S2.T. infrastructure has been developed starting from the study of the state-of-art about the available assembly procedure (on Earth and in space, if present), the existing platforms concepts for in-space procedure (not only the assembly ones) and the up-to-date deployable large structures which adopt different unfolding technologies. Once the background was established, we started trying to couple the more innovative, but feasible conceptual architectures, in a rational way. Each considered concept passed through a system engineering evaluation(https://www.nasa.gov/seh/index.html ) (e.g. “strength and weakness”) in the framework of a possible technological and conceptual breakthrough. Especially, the sources of inspiration came from the wide possibilities provided from the use of adhesive joints, into the assembly/disassembly-verification procedure and the use of large origami sandwich-like deployable structure.

The team has subdivided among the members several tasks as, for instance, the investigation on multiaxial robots for space applications, how the adhesives could be applied automatically, docking systems to catch the cargo modules from Earth, the “industrial” logistic that should be applied on the platform and, last but not least, the graphical part.

During this development process, we tried to think as little as possible as engineers (but without ignoring engineering implications) to make available the stream of innovation. Obviously, various issues arose, as example, “how to really to put into orbit and to inflate the proposed sandwich-like platform automatically?”, “how to really perform the assembly/disassembly-verification procedure?” or “what we are going to propose is really innovative, and, if yes, is it reliable and affordable?”.

These questions could not find easy answers during a two-days competition. However, we adopted a step-by-step approach thanks to which each single question found an appropriate (with margins) answer, achieving satisfactory outcomes. For instance, to the third question the team can answer “Yes, it is innovative in terms of conceptual design! It is also affordable because we intend to shift the assembly procedure reducing the on-ground costs related to the verification and design process in the framework of the launch environment”.

The team also tried to provide a simple Technology Readiness Level analysis (TRL) to show the current technological capability and an attempt of cost and functional tree analysis.

Talking about the adopted tools, we took advantage from graphical ones (e.g. draw.io) to convert our vision from abstract thoughts to a substantial real preliminary design, writing and presentation-maker software. Moreover, at this stage, coding is not feasible. It could be accessible after additional deep studies.

How We Used Space Agency Data in This Project

The space agency data have been a relevant source from which the team started for the state of art investigation. They clearly illustrate the up to date trend from a technological point of view. Particularly, they have been used as qualitative, rather than quantitative, demonstration in terms of needs, applications and future intentions (e.g. the use of additive manufacturing in space).

Data & Resources

https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/exep/technology/in-space-assembly/ ;

https://www.nasa.gov/missions/science/zipnuts.html ;

https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/resources/1015/flower-power-nasa-reveals-spring-starshade-animation/ ;

https://madeinspace.us/about/;

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740005082 ;

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740005084 ;

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/?s=inflatable ;

https://www.space.com/sierra-nevada-inflatable-habitat-moon-gateway.html ;

https://www.space.com/bigelow-aerospace-space-habitat-nasa-test.html ;

https://www.surrey.ac.uk/surrey-space-centre/missions/inflatesail ;

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170001569 ;

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180007255 ;

https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Advanced_Manufacturing ;

https://artes.esa.int/news/additive-manufacturing-%E2%80%93-making-impossible-possible-3d-printing ;

https://www.largespace.de/ ;

https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions ;

http://www.hps-gmbh.com/en/portfolio/subsystems/deployable-antennas-lea/ ;

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sdg/preprint/SDG%20dissertation.pdf ;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ly3hMBD4h5E ;

https://cdn2.b2match.io/event/3084/assets/8475250769-d3b6fe41d5.pdf ;

https://www.instituteforthefuture.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/CNS-Vision.pdf ;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHvrg_jN59g ;

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180007255 ;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjt2lOjMdJ0 ;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xP4_Q7iIlb0 ;

http://journal.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/abstract/abstract4632.shtml ;

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/59122511.pdf ;

Scientific papers

a.      On deployable and inflatable structures:

1.      Deployable Space Structures, Gökhan Kiper, Eres Söylemez;

2.      Inflatable Structures Technology Development Overview, Dr. Costa Cassapakis and Dr. Mitch Thomas;

3.      Large Space Structures (State of art and technology needs), Martin M. Mikulas, Jr.;

4.      Advanced Self-Deployable Structures for Space Applications, Witold. M. Sokolowski, Seng. C. Tan;

5.      Advances in Structures for Large Space Systems, W. Keith Belvin;

6.      Review of Inflatable Booms for Deployable Space Structures: Packing and Rigidization, Mark Schenk, Andrew D. Viquerat , Keith A. Seffen, and Simon D. Guest;

7.      Origami Based Folding Patterns for Compact Deployable Structures, M. Liyanage and C. Mallikarachchi;

8.      The Applicability of Past Innovative Concepts to the Technology for New Extremely Large Space Antenna/Telescope Structures, R. E. Freeland and R. G. Helms, M. M. Mikulas;

9.      Constraints Driven Design of a Surface Inflatable Habitat Module, Georgi Petrov and Constance M. Adams, Dmitri Jajich;

10.  Hybrid Deployable Habitat Structures for Orbital and Lunar/Planetary Applications, Larry Bell;

11.  Development of an Inflatable Airlock for Deep Space Exploration, D. Litteken;

12.  Sicsa space architecture seminar lecture series- part i: space structures and support systems, L. Bell (sicsa.uh.edu)

13.  Geometric and Kinematic Analyses and Novel Characteristics of Origami-Inspired Structures, Yao Chen, Jiayi Yan and Jian Feng.


b.     On adhesives technology:

1.      Adhesive bonding of aerospace materials-surface characterization of metallic adherends, M. Charbonnier, M. Remand, A. Roche and F. Gaillard;

2.      Durability of adhesive bonding of titanium in radiation and aerospace environments, S. Bhowmik, H.W. Bonin, V.T. Bui, R.D. Weir;

3.      Adhesive joints with improved mechanical properties for aerospace applications, G. Scarselli, Carola Corcione, F. Nicassio, A. Maffezzoli;

4.      The enhancement of adhesively-bonded aerospace-grade composite joints using steel fibres, Dong Quan, Josu Labarga Urdániz, Clémence Rouge, Alojz Ivankovića;

5.      Bonded repair of composite structures in aerospace application: a review on environmental issues, S. Budhe1, M. D. Banea and S. de Barros;

6.      Adhesive-bonded double-lap joints, Hart-Smith Nasa technical report.

Books on different topics:

1.      Deployable structure, S. Pellegrino;

2.      Spacecraft Structures and Mechanisms : From Concept to Launch, T. Sarafin;

3.      Space Mission Analysis and design, W. Larson, J. R. Wertz;

4.      Bonded Joints and Repairs to Composite Airframe Structures, Chun H. Wang and Cong N. Duong

5.      Manufacturing Technology for Aerospace Structural Materials, F.C. Campbell;

6.      Handbook of Adhesion Technology, Lucas F. M. da Silva, Andreas Ochsner, Robert D. Adams


Patents:

1.     Inflatable habitation volumes in space, patent no.: us 6,439,508 b1, Aug. 27, 2002

2.     United states patent, patent n0.: us 6,231,010 b1, schneider et al., date of patent: May 15, 2001

3.     Deployable boom, n0.: 3,434254, C.P. Rubin, March 25, 1969

Tags
#Flatsandwich-likeplatform, #Foaminflatable, #Spacegradeadhesives, #TOAS2T
Judging
This project was submitted for consideration during the Space Apps Judging process.