We developed a solution to the problem of assembling large structures in space. It consists of three elements: the Shepherd Tug, which brings the structures together, the Structural Ring with attachment points, which is integrated into each structure, and the powered Turnbuckles, which are used for the final locking together of the structures.
The system is designed to have as few requirements as possible for the structures being assembled, thus increasing the flexibility of design and lowering the cost of implementation. Our modular approach, with just a few simple standardized components, can be easily implemented by even the least technically advanced manufacturers. Nonetheless, structures with just the Ring built into them will be able to be assembled into large systems.
As you'll see in our presentation, the system works in four stages:
We hope that our system will not only save money for the builders, but that it will significantly expand their number and diversity, and will help democratize access to space.
We've been working in the area of satellite design for several years, and have produced a number of innovative vehicle and robotics designs:
When we read the Create/Connect Challenge requirements, we realized that we have a lot of experience in designing solutions for related problems. So we put together FFCP and Mantis to form the core of the Shepherd system design. Starting with a clean sheet of paper, we then designed the powered Turnbuckle and the structural Ring with the attachment points. Finally, we defined the Concept Of Operations which brings it all together.
We used Autodesk Fusion 360 CAD tool to design and assemble all the system components. Because F360 is such a powerful tool, it requires very powerful desktop computers. Alas, the machines available to us were not quite up to par for the complexity and scope of our designs. It required a great deal of patience to coax good results from the machines we had. Hopefully, in the future, we'll be able to upgrade our infrastructure such that similarly complex projects can be executed faster and with less risk of missing the deadline.
We used the NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) document archive. In particular, we found the papers on the NASA Technical Reports Server to be very interesting and useful.
We also used CAD data from McMaster-Carr, SDP-SI, and VXB Bearings.
Additionally, we hope to receive direct feedback from spacecraft designers and operations engineers of the agencies participating in the Challenge to help us improve the designs and the Concept of Operations.
Here's a link to the slide presentation (as a PDF file): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M6pzJQs3HdStyOYU_5y0aId8WUdYEtbn/view?usp=sharing